On Friday 09 November 2007 09:43, Robert Smits wrote: > On Friday 09 November 2007 01:12:31 G T Smith wrote: > > Robert Smits information rather confirms what I have suspected for > > some time about how one should assess a S.M.A.R.T report, > > unfortunately Robert did not give a link for the paper he referred > > to. I would be interested to have a look at it ... > > Happy to oblige..... > > http://209.85.163.132/papers/disk_failures.pdf
Thanks. Oddly enough, when I went to download that into my publications directory, I discovered I already had a copy that I downloaded back in February and which is byte-for-byte identical. > -- > Bob Smits [EMAIL PROTECTED] Randall Schulz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
