> > There is already web based *NIX admin tool with webmin, but the IP on > the this tool is a little murky. (I think SCO as caldera are involved > somewhere here). Developing a web version for Yast might open some legal > issues if not handled correctly, and I do not think that a design team > would be happy with to develop with the constraint of not moving to > close to the webmin model. > >
What the?????? My eyes almost jumped out of my face when I read this. Do you have any idea what you are talking about? Do you know the history of webmin? SCO are involved in somewhere? Wtf is that bizarre non-sense fud? Are you taking drugs? Can you show where they were involved? Can you point a reference? Might open some legal issues? If not handled correctly? What type of legal issues? Please specify. Are you a lawyer? Do you know whats the license of webmin? What are the constraints of moving or not moving to the webmin model? Do you know the wt toolkit they want to use in yast is ajax, while webmin is normal 1.0 web app? Have you ever used, actually? What does the design team have to do with this? What is the design team, btw? Design of what???? Seriously, please, please, please, if you want to ignore everything in this email, please keep this line: please, please, please do not talk about things you dont know, specially in this vague way. Do not make those statements if there isnt anyway you can back them. This is the same as doing FUD, this is no good, this is spreads wrong information. Please dont do it, I beg you. Do not talk about things you have not even slightly idea about what it is. The short text you wrote is meaningless, except for the times you simply state wrong information. I know its cool to participate and stuff, but dont talk about what you dont udnerstand, and dont spread fud, please. Thanks Marcio -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
