On 01/22/2008 08:59 AM, Jim Sabatke wrote:
I did not try Pascal's version. I checked the files for gimp in yast
before deleting it and they go into the same places that ./configure
--prefix=/opt/gnome put them. Of course, I would rather have an RPM
version.
For me, the EXIF data show up on my photo website, which is where I
noticed it was missing. I don't think I'm going to go back and re-edit
the 100, or so, photos I've added before I noticed.
You can also see the EXIF data in ufraw, but only in later versions.
The 10.2 version is about 4 versions behind current and I don't believe
it has EXIF support. I also hand compiled that one, which is no big
deal as I believe it only produces one lib file.
If you have ufraw available, then gimp will open raw files directly into
ufraw and "OK" will take that file into gimp with EXIF data intact. It
then writes it to jpeg files, but again only with the newer version if
ufraw.
Hope this all makes sense.
Well, I think I learned enough to be able to check. I saw that some
pictures had exif info, some did not. So I took one that did, edited it
in Gimp24, saved a cropped version, and the saved version also had exif
info. So IIANM, that should mean Pascal's version on Packman DOES
support exif. HTH. BTW, I do have ufraw and ufraw-gimp also installed.
--
Joe Morris
Registered Linux user 231871 running openSUSE 10.3 x86_64
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
