>From a user point of view, having two files that do the same thing is rather strange. Using the XML format is more inline with the J2EE model and is much easier to read.
+1 Justen Stepka ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Cannon-Brookes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 4:00 PM Subject: [OS-webwork] Views.properties - to deprecate or not > Hey all, > > OK - let me see if I can boil this issue down to simplicity. > > > "Should we deprecate views.properties?" > > > In my view, it should be deprecated - ie it will still work, but will no > longer be documented or referred to. > - actions.xml is a far simpler format to read > - anyone using J2EE MUST understand XML configuration files by now already > - maintaining two 'default' view configuration mechanisms can only confuse > new users. > > +1 from me. > > -mike > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in > Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be > fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
