+1 only if it's still allowed for the future. --------------------------------------------------------- Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote: > Hey all, > > OK - let me see if I can boil this issue down to simplicity. > > > "Should we deprecate views.properties?" > > > In my view, it should be deprecated - ie it will still work, but will no > longer be documented or referred to. > - actions.xml is a far simpler format to read > - anyone using J2EE MUST understand XML configuration files by now already > - maintaining two 'default' view configuration mechanisms can only confuse > new users. > > +1 from me. > > -mike > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in > Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be > fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
