> > -out or print (<ww:out value="foo/bar"/>) > > -push (<ww:push value="foo"><ww:out value="bar"/></ww:push>) > > -set (<ww:set value="foo/bar id="blah"/> <ww:out value="@blah"/>) > Yes - these are good names IMHO! > > After reading lots of names, print, push and set all seem intuitively to do > the right things? > > Print a variable > Push a variable on to the stack > Set a variable in another context
I am ok with out and set, but not with "push". The tag I called "focus" pushes and pops. The name "push" hardly seems intuitive in this regard. Furthermore, what if we decided we wanted a tag that just pushed later on? The name push for pushing would be taken. // Anders Hovmöller ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd522.html _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
