Damn! A little late :(. ----- Original Message ----- From: "matt baldree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Action invocation
> Can someone summarize the issues? If you build XWork the way you want what > would be left out? I don't think we can build a framework that will meet > everyone's needs and I don't think the new framework will be 100% backwards > compatible with WW nor do I think it should be. I'd rather see a clean room > design and see what desired requirements fall out. I think there are many > ways to slice this. If we had a document defining the requirements, I think > these discussions could be more productive. Rickard, could you draft a > requirements document from your point of view and post it on WIKI? > > -Matt > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rickard Öberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 8:46 AM > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Action invocation > > > Jason Carreira wrote: > >>The problem with that is keeping them in sync. I'd prefer > >>using one file > >>with namespaces instead. > > > > I'm planning on using Xdoclet, I don't know about you. :-) > > I'd probably use runtime attributes where possible, which is basically > the same thing. That does take care of some of those issues, but it'd > almost have to be mandatory for it to be practical to use. > > Ah well... personally I don't really care, since I have never used > declarative security and will never use it either. > > Maybe it would be better if I did a framework for my own needs instead, > and let you guys do what you is feel best in XWork. It seems we have > very different requirements, much of it coming from the point that most > of you seem to be doing straight web apps whereas I'm almost exclusively > doing portlet-style apps with a lot of state machine-ish stuff. I have a > lot of needs you don't have, and the other way round. > > /Rickard > > -- > Rickard Öberg > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Senselogic > > Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
