Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you all rename WebWork to XWork
because WebWork was a misnomer?  If the framework remains web-centric, why
not just call it WebWork 1.4?

Blake Day

>
> On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 03:29 AM, Rickard Öberg wrote:
>
>> This is a very difficult question. Separating it from the
>> javax.servlet API should be possible, but overall I have the feeling
>> that trying to make a *too* generic solution might be crippling.
>>
>> A little poll:
>> *) How many have actions that are used with more than one kind of
>> dispatcher?
>> *) How many are using WebWork in Swing apps?
>> *) How many are using WebWork for RPC style stuff? (the
>> ClientServletDispatcher and friends)
>>
> I don't use any of those and am quite unlikely to eve ruse them.
> Reason: I use app clients. webwork/xwork to me is ALL about being web
> only, and its role is to handle view related stuff and marshall things
> for the backend. EJBs do all the actual 'meat'. Appclients for me
> provide a far greater degree of separation, as if I went with the
> webwork framework for my swing clients, due to the possibility of
> wildly different UI's, I suspect I'd end up having to add a whole bunch
> of special chains/collections of actions for the appclients to use.
>
> I strongly suspect that swing/non web usage makes up 1% or less of all
> the users. Lets not make this unpleasant for the silent majority just
> to win a marketing line or two or some coolness points by saying 'we
> have nothing to do with the web!'. xwork should be targeted at the web,
> and should make the life of web developers a lot more pleasant and fun.
> It should NOT enforce that though and should work well outside of it,
> but web people should definitely be the main target audience.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork


-- 
Michael Blake Day
Artistry Studios
mobile: 770.480.1547




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE  SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your  SSL security issues.
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to