On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:02:45PM -0500, Joseph Ottinger wrote: > My point precisely. I think, given the current culture of XWork, we're > looking at WW 2.0 (major revision change) instead of XWork... and the > "webwork" name becomes appropriate. > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Michael Blake Day wrote: > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you all rename WebWork to XWork > > because WebWork was a misnomer? If the framework remains web-centric, why > > not just call it WebWork 1.4?
That's we XWork is in sandbox and should IMHO rest there until the dust has settled. So we all can calm down and go back to work ;-) -billy. -- Meisterbohne Söflinger Straße 100 Tel: +49-731-399 499-0 eLösungen 89077 Ulm Fax: +49-731-399 499-9
msg01201/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
