Francois Beauregard wrote:
>> I was not aware of that fact.
>> You are right. OpenSymphony seem to have got lately to a point
where there
>> is a good exchange of ideas and the community moves forward. This
must stay
>> the way it is right now.
>>
>> Do you remeber the reasons for the ranting?
Fran�ois, I don't believe that you should take Rickard's account of
what happened as definitive, particularly when there is a complete
electronic record of all of this that anybody can look at.
In the following post, a velocity users asks about monetary values in a
velocity template. At some point in the thread, I respond. Here is the
initial post of that thread, entitled "Comparing Monetary Value".
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
msg08355.html
Here is my initial contribution to the thread and thus, I suppose, this
is an example of my "ranting":
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
msg08366.html
I would encourage you to read through the whole thread and how it
developed. It actually becomes piquant. Quite entertaining stuff. But I
think you'll see that Rickard's characterization of what happened is
pretty stretched. What you'll see is that various people attempt to
engage me in debate and then, when they end up looking foolish *but
fairly, in legitimate technical debate* they then start the attacks on
my person. And then they later claim (quite mendaciously, of course)
that I was the one engaging in personal attacks on them!!!
> Yes, his belief that FreeMarker was the ultimate solution and that he
> was entitled to telling everyone of this regardless of everyone on
the
> list begging for the opposite.
To be clear, I see no real problem with telling people about FreeMarker
on a Velocity mailing list. There are 2 key reasons for this:
1. Velocity is a monumentally mediocre piece of work that only receives
the level of usage and attention that it does because it is part of
apache.org. Since there is such a huge disparity in the visibility of
Velocity and something like FreeMarker, I have no compunctions about
mentioning FreeMarker on the Velocity list, no more than I would in
mentioning FreeMarker on a list devoted to JSP. In any case, my
behavior there may have its obnoxious side. Fine. Okay.... BUT... but
what is the basic grievance? At the end of the day, the end-user can
always choose to use whichever tool suits him best. You may also note
that my posts were invariably factual and could have been helpful to
anybody making such a decision. It appears that the Velocity community
did not want anybody making comparisons.
2. Velocity developers have engaged in this kind of behavior themselves
on the webmacro mailing list. This was particularly obnoxious because,
of course Velocity is little more than a rip-off clone of Webmacro in
the first place. In fact, the origin of it is that Webmacro was
supposed to be an apache project, but there was some falling out
between Jon Stevens and Justin Wells and Jon Stevens started the
webmacro clone that became velocity. But anyway, given the history, the
velocity developers are very poorly placed to scream and holler about
me showing up on their mailing list. You see, they have bad karma...
> It was (to me) quite disgusting.
Well, I'm glad you put the "to me" there in parentheses. I am quite
convinced that some people derived vicarious pleasure from it. :-)
But anyway, I very honestly do not want to start a flamewar here. I
don't have the time for it and I don't have any quarrel with anyone
here. In fact, I have little intention of participating much more on
this list. But here's the key point: "Look, there's a complete
electronic record of all of this. Go look at it and see if Rickard's
characterization of my 'ranting' is accurate." That's pretty
reasonable, huh?
Best Regards,
Jonathan Revusky
--
Lead developer, FreeMarker project http://freemarker.org/
>/Rickard
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
- Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Freemarker WAS Using SiteMesh for th... Jonathan Revusky
- Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Freemarker WAS Using SiteMesh f... Rickard �berg
- Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Freemarker WAS Using SiteMe... Attila Szegedi
- Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Freemarker WAS Using SiteMe... Jonathan Revusky
- Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Freemarker WAS Using Si... boxed
- Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Freemarker WAS Usin... Jonathan Revusky
- Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Freemarker WAS Usin... Scott Farquhar
- Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Freemarker WAS... Chris Nokleberg
- Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Freemarker WAS Using Si... Hani Suleiman
- Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Freemarker WAS Usin... Jonathan Revusky
- [OS-webwork] (Offtopic) Freemarker WAS Using... Rickard �berg
