Well.... Talk to Mike. He actually coded it up to remove it. I bitched
at him enough until he looked and realized it wasn't necessary. About 2
hours before his presentation :-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork2, here I come!
> 
> 
> While I'm not sure that the ActionProxy stuff is heading in 
> that direction, believe me when I say I also don't think that 
> getting rid of interfaces is a great thing. Pico is doing 
> that (it calls start() and stop() using reflection rather 
> than Startable and Stopable). Likewise, at one point XWork 
> wasn't going to have an Action interface for the execute() 
> method, but I and others bitched enough to keep it. So don't 
> worry Hani and Anthony, we won't abandon you :P
> 
> -Pat
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hani Suleiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 9:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork2, here I come!
> 
> 
> > I agree completely. All this 'just define it/figure it out 
> at runtime' 
> > stuff really bothers me. Interfaces might be very 'old school' now, 
> > but they are useful, just so you know at compile time what 
> contracts 
> > your components/classes/whatever are adhering to. I still 
> have yet to 
> > look at xwork (waiting for migration guides+tools and performance 
> > reports), but the concept of having all information in an 
> xml file and 
> > an active effort to remove type safety/contracts from code 
> feels very 
> > wrong. I understand the allure of 'but you can use ANYTHING as an 
> > action!', but I do feel that those things that are used as 
> an action 
> > should anticipate somewhat that they are one and will be treated as 
> > one, in most cases.
> >
> > On Wednesday, July 2, 2003, at 11:54 AM, Anthony Eden wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jason Carreira wrote:
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Anthony Eden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > >>> On a side note, does anyone else notice that the use of dynamic 
> > >>> proxies is leading to code which acts more like dynamic typed 
> > >>> languages such as Python?
> > >>>
> > >>> Sincerely,
> > >>> Anthony Eden
> > >>>
> > >> No... Because they're strongly typed. But we're not 
> using dynamic 
> > >> proxies here...
> > >
> > > How do you mean you're not using dynamic proxies?  What 
> the heck is 
> > > ActionProxy then?  The actual command method which is invoked can 
> > > vary depending on the configuration.  Granted this is not dynamic 
> > > typing as seen in Python and other scripting languages, 
> but it still 
> > > feels like we are moving in that direction, i.e. Java is 
> attempting 
> > > to become more of a dynamic language (where less and less 
> is defined 
> > > at compile-time). FWIW, my comment is also based on the increased 
> > > interest in interaction between Java and scripting languages so 
> > > perhaps I should have included a little bit more context for my 
> > > comment.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Anthony Eden
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites 
> > > including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are 
> > > available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual 
> > > Studio .NET. 
> > > 
> http://aspnet.click->
url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/
> > > 01
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET 
> sites including 
> > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. 
> > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. 
> > 
> http://aspnet.click->
url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/
> > 01
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites 
> including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are 
> available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or 
> Visual Studio .NET. 
> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_06
1203_01/01
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to