On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:32:25AM -0700, Pat Lightbody wrote: > I don't agree, and I haven't looked at CVS lately, but if the Action > interface is gone I'd like for it to be put back so that we can discuss this > more. > [snip] > > I vote a BIG -1 to removing the Action interface, I have yet to see a real > use case that would demonstrate the importance of doing this. >
As an anonymous ww mailing list lurker I'd like to raise my voice on this one too. I really believe that removing the Action interface is a bad thing. Just because it's possible to remove the interface doesn't mean that it's the best thing to do. It would confuse newcomers to webwork as there is no longer a recognizable "component type" representing the "command" in the command pattern. +1 for keeping the interface. //Anders -- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Anders Engström [EMAIL PROTECTED] . http://www.gnejs.net PGP-Key: ED010E7F . [Your mind is like an umbrella. It doesn't work unless you open it.]
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
