I would agree with a previous poster that forcing the use of
fully-qualified names is actually less error prone. It may be a longer
string but that doesn't mean it's harder to use (ms worth of typing
saved). The big advantage is that refactoring tools will be able to find
the references correctly, or even simple text searches. It also allows
the use of similarly named actions in different packages. Overall, I'd
say having to not use the FQ name doesn't offer that much in
convenience, and is a risk and an obstacle to frequent refactoring.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
boxed
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Simplicity of WW2


Jason Carreira wrote:

>You should try out the FQN plugin for IDEA... It makes it as easy as 
>CTRL-SHIFT-Q to get the fully qualified name.
>  
>
On the other hand, if you need a tool to do it, it's obviously not a 
good system.

Anders Hovmöller





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to