I see no reason why this couldn't be included in webwork directly (and not webwork-extensions). Since it wouldn't be required to run unless you _wanted_ to use it, and it's a view technology just as XSLT and others are, I think it should be included. Please go ahead and create a jira issue if you haven't already and we'll get to it.
-Pat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cameron Braid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 5:30 AM Subject: [OS-webwork] Freemarker Views > I built an extension to the Freemarker servlet to provide transparent > value stack access. > > The reason that I have taken this approach instead of creating a custom > result type is that I wanted to keep all of the features of the > freemarker servlet (JSP tag support etc..) without reproducing too much > code, and with minimal effort (KISS) Plus, I didn't see the problem > with single request dispatcher forward. > > I want to contribute this code back to the community. > > The guys from the Freemarker project would prefer that this integration > code be kept under the webwork hood. > > The only change would be a compile time dependancy on a single jar .. > though it is 750k. > > Another posibility would be a new java.net project webwork-extensions. > To contain this, and any other extensions that anyone else wants to > contribute. > > What are your thoughts ? > > Cameron. > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
