Anders, WebWork was meant, from the start, to include optional components. It was built to be an extension upon XWork to include various view support. If we made FreeMarker a view technology that ended up in webwork-extensions, why wouldn't velocity, JSP, XSLT, and JasperReports go there too? Webwork-extensions should be for stuff that is optional to WebWork...
So in short: Views are optional to XWork, but core to WebWork Stuff like IoC are optional to WebWork, but core to WebWork-extensions. Make sense? -Pat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anders Engström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:26 PM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Freemarker Views IMO this would be an excellent starting point for a "webwork-extensions". Keeping the download size down, and avoiding dependency-hell is a nice thing - and it helps keep the code base modular. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
