No, the SF repositories are dead... go ahead and drop it in java.net CVS. I'm kinda thinking the freemarker lib should be in lib/optional, but we can fix that later.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Cameron Braid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 8:06 PM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Freemarker Views > Shall I add it to the CVS repository at java.net then ? > > If so should I put, source in com.opensymphony.webwork.views.freemarker, > and lib in /lib/core ? > > Also.. I am not sure what is ggoing on with CVS.. Are we still comitting > to SourceForge ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Pat Lightbody > Sent: Tuesday, 26 August 2003 11:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Freemarker Views > > > I see no reason why this couldn't be included in webwork directly (and > not webwork-extensions). Since it wouldn't be required to run unless you > _wanted_ to use it, and it's a view technology just as XSLT and others > are, I think it should be included. Please go ahead and create a jira > issue if you haven't already and we'll get to it. > > -Pat > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cameron Braid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 5:30 AM > Subject: [OS-webwork] Freemarker Views > > > > I built an extension to the Freemarker servlet to provide transparent > > value stack access. > > > > The reason that I have taken this approach instead of creating a > > custom result type is that I wanted to keep all of the features of the > > > freemarker servlet (JSP tag support etc..) without reproducing too > > much code, and with minimal effort (KISS) Plus, I didn't see the > > problem with single request dispatcher forward. > > > > I want to contribute this code back to the community. > > > > The guys from the Freemarker project would prefer that this > > integration code be kept under the webwork hood. > > > > The only change would be a compile time dependancy on a single jar .. > > though it is 750k. > > > > Another posibility would be a new java.net project webwork-extensions. > > > To contain this, and any other extensions that anyone else wants to > > contribute. > > > > What are your thoughts ? > > > > Cameron. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware > With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. > WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the > same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware > With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. > WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines > at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
