> -----Original Message----- > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 5:23 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > That was my idea in one of my previous post, but finally I > think it's not a so good idea. Multiply the levels of control > is a danger that can make the validation framework not so > easy to use. Why not just add support to the converters that > could do the job, merely in dealing with the errors that > could be generated by converters. Converting a string to a > date could generate an error from the converter, and so > managed by the validation framework. > > 1/ Populating the bean > HTTP Input Parameters ----converters at work------> Bean > populated in Action class > > If converters can't convert, a null value is set and an error > could be stored in order to be used by the validation framework > > 2/ Validation of the bean > - Extract errors from converters > - Execute the validation from conf files ...-conversion.xml > > Richard. >
What do you mean by the Validators using the errors? The validators just validate the properties. Jason ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
