It's really a problem, i cant understand anybody else is requesting that !!
-----Message d'origine----- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Adam Fleming Envoye : lundi 29 septembre 2003 18:49 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details Hi, This is a problem I am having trouble with too (as I am sure many others). How can you get the original input if the field you are validating is not a String? Is this possible now with an expression validator and something like request.getParam(myField) != null && request.getParam()... -af Fred Lamuette wrote: > Ok, you say "Type conversion handle this". But when will be planned that the > user-defined converters add a field error (maybe with a specific Exception > thrown as you said) ? > Cheers. > Richard. > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de > Jason Carreira > Envoye : samedi 27 septembre 2003 14:19 > A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > You thought what I said was overcomplicated? This sounds WAY too > complicated... Type conversion handles this... > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 1:53 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details >> >> >>In fact, this way of thinking is overcomplicated. Why cant we >>add another level of validation. >> >>Level 1 before ParamsInterceptor : >> I validate the representation types of input parameters >>(ActionContext.getContext().getParameters()) >> For instance, a string represents really a date. >> >>Level 2 after ParamsInterceptor : >> I validate the bean data. >> For instance, date1 is not null, date1>date2, ... >> >>Any remarks ? >>Cheers. >>Richard. >> >>-----Message d'origine----- >>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>la part de Jason Carreira Envoye : vendredi 26 septembre 2003 >>16:54 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>My question : how can i do to see the message "Your text "Foo Bar" >>>could not be parsed as a date", what can i do in my >> >>dateconverter to >> >>>add a FieldError ???? >>> >>>Cheers. >>>Richard. >> >>Short answer: You can't >>Long answer: You can't, yet... >> >>I'm trying to figure out if it's ok for you if we figure out >>how to make the converter add a field error, but then the >>RequiredFieldValidator is also going to add a message. >> >>I think we can do this with a custom runtime error... >> >>throw new XworkTypeConversionMessageException("Your text '" + >>value + "' could not be parsed as a date"); >> >>The type conversion framework can be made to catch this >>exception type and add the message from it to the field errors. >> >>Jason >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >>Welcome to geek heaven. >>http://thinkgeek.com/sf >>_______________________________________________ >>Opensymphony-webwork mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >>Welcome to geek heaven. >>http://thinkgeek.com/sf >>_______________________________________________ >>Opensymphony-webwork mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
