You thought what I said was overcomplicated? This sounds WAY too complicated... Type conversion handles this...
> -----Original Message----- > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 1:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > In fact, this way of thinking is overcomplicated. Why cant we > add another level of validation. > > Level 1 before ParamsInterceptor : > I validate the representation types of input parameters > (ActionContext.getContext().getParameters()) > For instance, a string represents really a date. > > Level 2 after ParamsInterceptor : > I validate the bean data. > For instance, date1 is not null, date1>date2, ... > > Any remarks ? > Cheers. > Richard. > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > la part de Jason Carreira Envoye : vendredi 26 septembre 2003 > 16:54 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > My question : how can i do to see the message "Your text "Foo Bar" > > could not be parsed as a date", what can i do in my > dateconverter to > > add a FieldError ???? > > > > Cheers. > > Richard. > > Short answer: You can't > Long answer: You can't, yet... > > I'm trying to figure out if it's ok for you if we figure out > how to make the converter add a field error, but then the > RequiredFieldValidator is also going to add a message. > > I think we can do this with a custom runtime error... > > throw new XworkTypeConversionMessageException("Your text '" + > value + "' could not be parsed as a date"); > > The type conversion framework can be made to catch this > exception type and add the message from it to the field errors. > > Jason > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
