On Friday 09 July 2004 00:35, Mathias Sundman wrote: > > What I am trying to say? I am very happy that you guys are actively > > working on openvpn. Really. > > > > Just please do not OVERdesign it. > > > > Maybe it's better to try to port daemontools to Windows > > and run openvpn daemon(s) under it. > > I agree that we must watch out so we don't overdesign it. It's easily > done. However, one thing to keep in mind is that we're not talking about > adding complexity to the openvpn binary (except for an interface to get > status information), and we're not talking about removing current > functionallity. > > Which means that it will still be perfectly possible to run openvpn just > like we have always done from the cmd-line or from the init-scripts, and I > think this will continue to be the most-used method on unix platforms. > > Windows users on the other hand tends to want automatic graphical > installation packages and a nice gui to click on, and get afraid if they > need to edit a textfile! So we need to keep the whole chain from > installation to operating really simple. > > Do you think we can achive this using deamon tools?
IMHO daemontools for windows, if ported, can handle quite a variety of different setups, including one needed by openvpn. Then you can install it as part of openvpn install. -- vda
