Hi,

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 09:45:07PM -0500, selva.n...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Selva Nair <selva.n...@gmail.com>
> >
> > Also make sure --dhcp-pre-release results in not just dhcp_release()
> > in open_tun() but a subsequent dhcp_renew() as well. Else dhcp
> transaction
> > gets aborted as this call to release() happens after the adapter status
> > is changed to connected.
> >
> > Alternatively, the undocumented --dhcp-pre-release may be removed.
> >
> > Fixes Trac #807 (but can't say the same for Trac #665 without knowing
> > how to reproduce it)
>
> After thinking about this for a while, I agree we should do this, so
> ACK (even if Debbie10t already has ACKed it).
>
> I'd ask for a few changes, though :-) - if I'm reading this correctly,
> tt->options.dhcp_release is now unused, so I think we should do it
> all the way - get rid of that flag variable, print a message
> ("obsolete option detected, already on" or so) if --dhcp-release
> is configured, and update the man page ("this option is a no-op now,
> as the functionality is enabled by default starting in 2.4.1").
>

Agreed. Will send a v2 later today.

Thanks,

Selva
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel

Reply via email to