Ohio gozaimas Nicolas-san, On 7/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi John, > > > >So you're looking for a quicker reply ? > >Does the user have to wait for something ? We could > >try working on the > >'perceived' response time. > > Really quick reply from home (late at night ..doh!) > > The user has two perceived time: > - the time between the activation is requested and the flow is started (this > waits for the flow to be started for notifications of errors) > - the time the workitem is in the inbox. > > But, pretty much, by the time the flow is instanciated, the work item is > almost ready in the inbox (this is the user-*/group-*/role-* type of > participant, so it comes in straight after the flow is started) > Most of the time (again, looking at openwfe logs, which may not be accurate) > is being used preparing openwfe objects. > > Hope this gives better indication of what I would like to achieve.
Well, it doesn't speak to me... It's maybe me, I've had a long day debugging stuff around. And the 1.7.1 release is quite successful. > I will do a full session with timestamps and more useful messages and timing > tomorrow　and send them to the list. That would be interesting indeed. Wake up well, I wish you a nice italian espresso, -- John Mettraux -///- http://jmettraux.openwfe.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ OpenWFE - Open source WorkFlow Engine OpenWFE-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openwfe-users
