Hello > Hi Nicolas, > > 8s is that amount constant ? Is it a 'cold start' number ? Do > successive activations yield a lower number ? Constant. and the temperature does not make any difference :d
> > The classical answer would be : get more RAM. That doesn't make any difference. RAM is not a problem here. Even switching to our live server does not reduce the time that much. > Another would be : > pre-launch the activation flow and show it only when needed (keep one > or two always ready), but that's not very elegant. err. Yeah, I prefer the second solution below. > > Have you tried binding the core (bulk) of the process definition at > the engine level from the library so that it's already in Expression > form in the memory ? I mentioned that in one of my first replies. > I'm not sure I know how to deal with this... But that looks like basic OpenWfe API usage right ? Do you have a link to the documentation ? Thanks ! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ OpenWFE - Open source WorkFlow Engine OpenWFE-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openwfe-users
