On 7/20/06, John Mettraux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 8s is that amount constant ? Is it a 'cold start' number ? Do > successive activations yield a lower number ? > > The classical answer would be : get more RAM. Another would be : > pre-launch the activation flow and show it only when needed (keep one > or two always ready), but that's not very elegant. > > Have you tried binding the core (bulk) of the process definition at > the engine level from the library so that it's already in Expression > form in the memory ? I mentioned that in one of my first replies.
And of course, I forgot to mention the 'demanded' caching of the flows. I'll have a look at that too : IIRC it's very easy to reactivate/reimplement and that's elegant. Unfortunately, I'll be in Russia since saturday, with no laptop and too much vodka. I'll try to have a look at caching before that. Cheers, John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ OpenWFE - Open source WorkFlow Engine OpenWFE-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openwfe-users
