Thanks for sharing  documents, Jason. In fact, the document can easily get
from the Internet; Addtionally, you probably don't know about China and
chinese's college education, nowadays, many universities have offered course
about linux. Maybe you don't find the right people.



2010/7/17 linux_pro <snipe...@gmail.com>

> In China, this datasheet is full of the underground market. Just openwrt
> not made it.
> I believe that not only China, the more countries there is such a thing.
>
> thanks jason.
> thanks florian.
>
> 2010/7/16 Spudz76 <spud...@gmail.com>
>
> They have these datasheets and STILL can't do it.  ouch.
>>
>> jason duhamell wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to hire people to move to china, I am sick of the people
>>> building stuff not knowing what they are building. Education is a huge
>>> problem in china and not many universities teach linux. If anybody would
>>> like to discuss that, feel free to join in the conversation.
>>>
>>>  On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Spudz76 <spud...@gmail.com <mailto:
>>> spud...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>    I'm positive it's not his own NDA that is being violated, he's
>>>    just resourceful and weird things happen in China.  He never made
>>>    such an agreement and is not bound by the scary little grey
>>>    watermarks, and neither are we.  The only people or projects at
>>>    any real risk here are whoever leaked it and broke their NDA
>>>    contract, but then Atheros would have to be smart enough to
>>>    individually tag each released PDF with an identifier that can't
>>>    be scrubbed or modified in order to trace a leak back to its
>>>    source.  Considering this PDF doesn't even have the simple options
>>>    enabled for "no print" and "no cut/paste" I completely doubt they
>>>    did any of that.  Also it was generated by "cairo graphics", an
>>>    open source graphics package with a PDF output generator, so it's
>>>    probably already been scrubbed or Atheros is too cheap to use real
>>>    Adobe software to generate its datasheets.
>>>
>>>    Technically most of the reverse engineering that goes on in order
>>>    for this project to exist in the first place is just as dangerous
>>>    and/or illegal.  There is code from improperly packaged GPL
>>>    tarballs that still has "Broadcom Proprietary Do Not Distribute"
>>>    or at least their copyright in the headers, and
>>>    Linksys/Belkin/whoever didn't get legally kicked in the balls for it.
>>>
>>>    Basically it would cost them more to chase and enforce their NDA
>>>    than it would be worth, on a product this old.  They already moved
>>>    on to the AR9xxx series, and that's what they would more likely
>>>    stomp on people for, if even.
>>>
>>>    Of course still toss in the token "We can't be involved with this
>>>    type of thing" as a good measure, but then don't negate it
>>>    completely by basically saying "but I still want these if you
>>>    email me secretly" in more or less the same sentence.  You might
>>>    as well have just said thanks.
>>>
>>>    Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>
>>>        On Friday 16 July 2010 15:05:51 jason duhamell wrote:
>>>
>>>            fuck them. open source all the way.
>>>
>>>
>>>        You can express your point of view, I do not really care, but
>>>        you do not have to impact the project in its whole by
>>>        violating your own NDA and pushing such a datasheet in a
>>>        public mailing-list.
>>>
>>>        What happens if Atheros wants to take down the site?
>>>
>>>        Think twice before you type Send please.
>>>
>>>
>>>            On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Florian Fainelli
>>>            <flor...@openwrt.org <mailto:flor...@openwrt.org>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>                On Friday 16 July 2010 14:59:03 Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>>>
>>>                    Thanks Jason, datasheet is always valuable stuff!
>>>
>>>                Yeah especially if you are not allowed to distribute it.
>>>
>>>                Please send such stuff in private in order not to
>>>                compromise the project
>>>                with
>>>                potential legal issues.
>>>                --
>>>                Florian
>>>                _______________________________________________
>>>                openwrt-devel mailing list
>>>                openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>>>                <mailto:openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>
>>>
>>>                https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>>>
>>>        _______________________________________________
>>>        openwrt-devel mailing list
>>>        openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>>>        <mailto:openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>
>>>
>>>        https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>>>
>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>    openwrt-devel mailing list
>>>    openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>>>    <mailto:openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>
>>>
>>>    https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>>>
>>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to