On 11.05.2021 19:54, John Crispin wrote:
On 11.05.21 19:51, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 11.05.2021 19:46, John Crispin wrote:
On 11.05.21 19:45, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
I'm really tired of dealing with such hacky solutions. Look at netifd,
DSA and LuCI as example. We ended up with something that noone fully
understands. Jo - our UI guru - couldn't deal with designing a proper
UI for that f*cked config syntax.
sorry mate, I am not the reason you are having a bad day, so dont vent it out
on me.
It's just an example of shitty situation we got. Nothing more.
I took a good amount of time to provide valuable review for the
[PATCH v2] rtl83xx-poe: add package
I described problems, missing parts, provided examples how one can
solve it. Let's discuss that please. Instead of commenting on one
example I provided.
lulz, why so aggravated ... its about the code not the person ...
possibly I missed some of your feedback, will review tomorrow, keep the spirit
mate and just chill a little ...
Apparently I've used too strong words, I'm sorry for that, that was
unintentional. I was trying to provide strong arguments and f*kup
example in a good faith, but as I understand it, it sounded rude.
I'd like to help adding PoE support in a clean way from the beginning,
I'll come with some ideas and maybe a code later this week. Please hold
on a bit with commiting this code, I hope we can refactor it a bit in a
reasonable time.
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
