Hi, I can understand that it took a long time. The wasp loader kernel module v5 is the next in the review list of the remoteproc-linux kernel list. I will try to deal with Haukes suggestions by the end of the week. With regards to the packages, I think wpad is a left over from my tests and I can remove it and I will rework the kernel patches. But for the special packages that are not honored by the build bots, I do not really have a solution. For now I was thinking of instructions to use the image builder, which also means, that as a start there will not be any downloadable images that cover all possible functionality.
Daniel. -----Original-Nachricht----- Betreff: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] 22.03 lantiq: add support for x490 Fritzboxes Datum: 2022-10-25T00:24:57+0200 Von: "Hauke Mehrtens" <ha...@hauke-m.de> An: "Torsten Duwe" <d...@lst.de>, "openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org" <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> On 10/23/22 13:19, Torsten Duwe wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is my second attempt for initial FritzBox x490 support. 22.03 now > has all the necessary prerequisites, so support can be added according > to the rules. > > The original code snippets were submitted by John Crispin (IIRC), > Andreas Böhler and Daniel Kestrel. I carved out the changes I > considered necessary, integrated and tested them and cleaned them up > (hopefully ;) > > These are the minimal changes required to run the FB {3,7}490 as DSL > router (tested!). The 5490 is reported to be similar, so I included > it, but could not test it due to lack of hardware. > > The wireless on these boxes is offloaded to a secondary SoC which > needs to be provided its own OS. This feature is explicitly left out > here in order to go step by step. I kept some loose ends where they > don't hurt, for future reference. > > Changes from v1: > ---------------- > > * return to squashfs for the rootfs; ubifs causes too much complexity > esp. for updates, when even the same model can be equipped with > varying flash chip geometries. UBI partitioning and volumes are kept > though. Hi, How is this related to the pull request adding support for these devices on github? https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/5075 The pull request on github looks mostly ok to me, I just had some minor questions. Hauke _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel