On 03/16/2015 04:06 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote: > On 16/03/15 15:51, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote: >> On 03/16/2015 02:49 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote: >>> On 26/01/15 13:00, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote: >>>> In the periodic case, will some indices be encountered twice? >>> >>> I'm not sure I understand the question. All indices may, and typically >>> will, be encountered multiple times in the assembly stage. >> Ok, this is also a nice-to-know assumption, because it dictates how you >> can assemble. > > It just occurred to me that you might have had something slightly > different in mind. By construction, the 'l2g' values will be unique > within a particular cell's "view" of the mapping so you don't have to > allow for repeated indices in a single cell. However, other cells will > typically affect some of the same global degrees of freedom so unless we > completely modify the process we need to support update-construction of > the form > > S_[i][j] += S_value > rhs_[i] += b_value >
Yeah, and this is what I account for by supporting the accumulator scheme. It's still a nice thing to have written down as a comment, as I did spend some time trying to figure out if it was intentional or not. Because in the periodic case, it uses plain assignment S_[i][j] = x, whereas in all the other cases it uses +=. I ported it to use += in all cases, and it still gives the same result.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
