Hi Mark and all,

I wonder whether there is any channel to collect responses about the data
on git/wiki/mailing list to make the dashboard easier to usage.
There are too many raw data.

BR/Julien

Beierl, Mark <mark.bei...@dell.com>于2018年1月12日周五 上午4:54写道:

> Hello, folks.
>
> This is the test results dashboard, not analytics on git/wiki/mailing
> list, etc, usage.  Bitergia has a second contract with LF to provide
> visualizations for the various test projects output.  Hope that clears
> things up :)
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> *Mark Beierl*
> SW System Sr Principal Engineer
> *Dell **EMC* | Cloud & Communication Service Provider Solution
> mobile +1 613 314 8106 <1-613-314-8106>
> mark.bei...@dell.com
>
> On Jan 11, 2018, at 11:12, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <
> bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> wrote:
>
> If it results in some gaps being better socialized and prioritized, it's a
> good idea to meet. E.g. I sent a request back in Nov and got no response...
> it was:
>
> I’d like the ability to view/download the full set of data for a
> particular query, e.g. as you have from stackalytics (setting for “Show <n>
> entries”).
>
> Thanks,
> Bryan Sullivan | AT&T
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [
> mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
> <opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>] On Behalf Of Dave Neary
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 6:50 AM
> To: Yuyang (Gabriel) <gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>; '
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>;
> test...@lists.opnfv.org
> Cc: Alberto Pérez García-Plaza <alpgar...@bitergia.com>; Alvaro del
> Castillo <a...@bitergia.com>; Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona <j...@bitergia.com>
> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Collecting questions for the Biterg
> Dashboard Training //RE: Issues/Needs/requirements for Biterg dashboard
>
> Hi,
>
> Is the goal to get a better idea of how we can use the dashboard ("How
> can I tell how many companies were active in a project between date 1
> and date 2, excluding LF employees? What data sources are available for
> query?" type questions), or is it to identify qualitative questions we
> would like to answer with data ("Are we keeping participants over time?
> Are there projects for which timely  patch review/acknowledgement of
> issues is a challenge?") - understanding the goal of the tutorial would
> help with identifying the right questions to ask.
>
> Thanks,
> Dave.
>
> On 01/11/2018 04:40 AM, Yuyang (Gabriel) wrote:
>
> Hi Community,
>
>
>
> As discussed, Biterg will arrange a training session of OPNFV statistics
> dashboard for the community in test working group meeting.
>
> Basically, it will last about 1 hour as the usual first training
> covering the needs of navigating through panels, filtering the relevant
> results, sharing and exporting capabilities, etc.
>
> Before this wonderful thing could happen, it would better if you look at
> the dashboard first and feedback questions regarding the operations,
> visualizations,  settings, statistics results and etc. as input for the
> training.
>
> So that the training session could meet your needs in more efficient
> manner.
>
>
>
> During last Testperf meeting, we have already discussed some needs and
> questions which are listed below. Please post your questions/needs behind.
>
> 1.       How the commit number is calculated? What are involved in this
> metric? Including review?
>
> 2.       When searching commit number for a specific person, there will
> be other persons involved in the results page. Are these persons for the
> calculation of reviews?
>
> 3.       How should I search for the statistics results (commits, code
> line, patchsets, etc., ) of a project with aggregation results of
> companies, persons involved in this project
>
> 4.       Needs for comprehensive introduction of the dashboard including
> every operations, filtering relevant information, where the dashboard
> retrieve datas, etc.?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gabriel
>
>
>
> *From:*Yuyang (Gabriel)
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 04, 2018 9:43 AM
> *To:* 'Alberto Pérez García-Plaza' <alpgar...@bitergia.com>
> *Cc:* 'Alvaro del Castillo' <a...@bitergia.com>; 'Raymond Paik'
> <rp...@linuxfoundation.org>; 'mark.bei...@emc.com'
> <mark.bei...@emc.com>; 'Brandon Wick' <bw...@linuxfoundation.org>;
> 'jalaus...@suse.com' <jalaus...@suse.com>; 'Rao, Sridhar'
> <sridhar....@spirent.com>; 'Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona'
> <j...@bitergia.com>; 'cedric.olliv...@orange.com'
> <cedric.olliv...@orange.com>; 'Brattain, Ross B'
> <ross.b.bratt...@intel.com>; 'Cooper, Trevor' <trevor.coo...@intel.com>;
> 'test...@lists.opnfv.org' <test...@lists.opnfv.org>;
> 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
> *Subject:* RE: Issues/Needs/requirements for Biterg dashboard
>
>
>
> Hi Alberto,
>
>
>
> Do not know if you are back from holiday yet. Just want to check-in for
> the proposal and training session.
>
> Do you have some basic ideas now?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gabriel
>
>
>
> *From:*Yuyang (Gabriel)
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 14, 2017 11:33 AM
> *To:* 'Alberto Pérez García-Plaza' <alpgar...@bitergia.com
> <mailto:alpgar...@bitergia.com <alpgar...@bitergia.com>>>
> *Cc:* Alvaro del Castillo <a...@bitergia.com <mailto:a...@bitergia.com
> <a...@bitergia.com>>>;
> Raymond Paik <rp...@linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org <rp...@linuxfoundation.org>>>;
> mark.bei...@emc.com
> <mailto:mark.bei...@emc.com <mark.bei...@emc.com>>; Brandon Wick <
> bw...@linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bw...@linuxfoundation.org <bw...@linuxfoundation.org>>>;
> jalaus...@suse.com
> <mailto:jalaus...@suse.com <jalaus...@suse.com>>; Rao, Sridhar <
> sridhar....@spirent.com
> <mailto:sridhar....@spirent.com <sridhar....@spirent.com>>>; Jesus M.
> Gonzalez-Barahona
> <j...@bitergia.com <mailto:j...@bitergia.com <j...@bitergia.com>>>;
> cedric.olliv...@orange.com
> <mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com <cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>;
> 'Brattain, Ross B'
> <ross.b.bratt...@intel.com <mailto:ross.b.bratt...@intel.com
> <ross.b.bratt...@intel.com>>>; Cooper,
> Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com <mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com
> <trevor.coo...@intel.com>>>;
> test...@lists.opnfv.org <mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org
> <test...@lists.opnfv.org>>;
> 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>>
> *Subject:* RE: Issues/Needs/requirements for Biterg dashboard
>
>
>
> Hi Alberto,
>
>
>
> During plugfest, we had some discussion about the Biterg dashboard
> regarding the strange values, subpages and the training session.
>
> 1.       As to the strange values, it’d be better we leave them to
> corresponding testing projects to decide whether or not to correct.
>
> 2.       I have found Morgan’s slides on the subpages for testing
> projects:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_download_attachments_2926539_Sync-2520Bitergia-2520092017.pptx-3Fversion-3D1-26modificationDate-3D1505987158000-26api-3Dv2&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0&m=M4WyxD79MdKiV1ur-V2JqPcZ9LzaQGyxQCnCSYMbxaY&s=9L15BSrM_I20f-id5aqsoPuJfwcm1qGclcTM33p_LrE&e=
> where we have the visualizations of testing results. However, as I
> mentioned before, in my mind the dashboard could automatically generate
> search results page for different project/keyword. Project that has
> special needs could sent out requirements for its subpage. Before that,
> please refer to the slides for the testing results of test cases for
> your proposal
>
> 3.       As to the Biterg dashboard training session, it is suggested
> that we have it in Testperf Meeting and be recorded. My guess is that
> 30-40 mins is enough to show operations and customizations. What your
> opinion?
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Gabriel
>
>
>
> *From:*Alberto Pérez García-Plaza [mailto:alpgar...@bitergia.com
> <alpgar...@bitergia.com>]
> *Sent:* Monday, November 20, 2017 11:53 PM
> *To:* Yuyang (Gabriel) <gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com
> <mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com <gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>>
> *Cc:* Alvaro del Castillo <a...@bitergia.com <mailto:a...@bitergia.com
> <a...@bitergia.com>>>;
> Raymond Paik <rp...@linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org <rp...@linuxfoundation.org>>>;
> mark.bei...@emc.com
> <mailto:mark.bei...@emc.com <mark.bei...@emc.com>>; Brandon Wick <
> bw...@linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bw...@linuxfoundation.org <bw...@linuxfoundation.org>>>;
> jalaus...@suse.com
> <mailto:jalaus...@suse.com <jalaus...@suse.com>>; Rao, Sridhar <
> sridhar....@spirent.com
> <mailto:sridhar....@spirent.com <sridhar....@spirent.com>>>; Jesus M.
> Gonzalez-Barahona
> <j...@bitergia.com <mailto:j...@bitergia.com <j...@bitergia.com>>>;
> cedric.olliv...@orange.com
> <mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com <cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>;
> 'Brattain, Ross B'
> <ross.b.bratt...@intel.com <mailto:ross.b.bratt...@intel.com
> <ross.b.bratt...@intel.com>>>; Cooper,
> Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com <mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com
> <trevor.coo...@intel.com>>>;
> test...@lists.opnfv.org <mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org
> <test...@lists.opnfv.org>>;
> 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>>
> *Subject:* Re: Issues/Needs/requirements for Biterg dashboard
>
>
>
> Hi Gabriel,
>
> thanks so much. I'll prepare the proposal asap. Hope to do it during the
> next couple of weeks as I  am a bit busy.
>
> Regarding 1, let me know as soon as you decide how to proceed to
> schedule the actions needed on our side.
>
> Cheers,
> Alberto.
>
> El 17/11/17 a las 04:34, Yuyang (Gabriel) escribió:
>
>    Hi,
>
>
>
>    As discussed yesterday, Alberto will provide *a proposal *for the
>    dashboarding of testing projects together with*a training *for the
>    community regarding the customization of the ELK dashboard.
>
>    Before that, there are still several issues we need to resolve.
>
>
>
>    1.       Strange values for version, criteria and scenario. We need
>    to decide how we deal with these values.
>
>    During the discussion we have 3 options here:
>
>    a)         We can make the dashboard not show the results from these
>    values, i.e., screening the results from these values
>
>    b)         Each project to correct the values in TestDB to compliant
>    with our Naming Conventions
>
>    c)         We correct as many as we can and leave the ones for
>    project-wise purposes.
>
>    Project
>
>
>
>    Version
>
>
>
>    Criteria
>
>
>
>    Scenario
>
>    Bottlenecks
>
>
>
>    stable/Euphrates
>
>
>
>    None
>
>
>
>    None
>
>    QTIP
>
>
>
>    None
>
>
>
>    1640, 1777, 1785, 1562, 1734, 1662, 1669, 1636
>
>
>
>    generic
>
>    VSPERF
>
>
>
>    OVScc3a32f3b6891168cee98812e8f5e3d8a5a52c98 DPDK v17.02
>
>    OVScc3a32f3b6891168cee98812e8f5e3d8a5a52c98
>
>    OVScc3a32f3b6891168cee98812e8f5e3d8a5a52c98 DPDK not used
>
>    OVSed26e3ea9995ba632e681d5990af5ee9814f650e DPDK v16.07
>
>
>
>    None
>
>
>
>    vsperf
>
>
>
>    2.       Needs/requirements/necessity for generating subpages for
>    testing projects.
>
>    There has been a long discussion about the subpages for testing
>    projects in Biterg dashboard.
>
>    Since the dashboard could automatically generate search results page
>    for different project/keyword, we need to collect special needs for
>    projects if the they are planning to show a subpage under the
>    testing tab.
>
>    There is a table below made by Morgan summarizing the needs/issues
>    for this purpose.
>
>    If you are planning to create a subpage, please make sure that the
>    testing results of your test cases are pushed to TestDB and send the
>    example graphs to Biterg team.
>
>    Alberto will make a proposal based on the needs (for the projects
>    that need a subpage)
>
>    *Project*
>
>
>
>    *Subpage
>    Status*
>
>
>
>    *OPNFV contacts*
>
>
>
>    *Customized expected *
>    *graph(s) *
>
>
>
>    *Comments*
>
>    Functest
>
>
>
>    created <
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__opnfv.biterg.io_goto_141bf895a14364f7408d0a77ac16e4bc&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0&m=M4WyxD79MdKiV1ur-V2JqPcZ9LzaQGyxQCnCSYMbxaY&s=sjCf-tjny39FL3L9o6XaSyf8I1bLAweESWC4w1QesSU&e=
> >
>
>
>
>    cedric.olliv...@orange.com <mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com
> <cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>
>
>    jalaus...@suse.com <mailto:jalaus...@suse.com <jalaus...@suse.com>>
>
>
>
>    1 graph :
>    - (Runs, Failures, Cases) = f(time)
>
>
>
>    display error on the test run/fail/skip graphs –only Sum of Failures
>    displayed
>
>    Graphs can be used for tempest/refstack/snaps_smoke
>
>    storperf
>
>
>
>    not created
>
>
>
>    mark.bei...@emc.com <mailto:mark.bei...@emc.com <mark.bei...@emc.com>>
>
>
>
>    1 graph
>    - Bandwidth(bandwidth, average bandwidth, 110 % average, 90 %
>    average, slope) = f(time)
>
>
>
>    storperf created a docker for reporting
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__docs.opnfv.org_en_latest_submodules_storperf_docs_testing_user_storperf-2Dreporting.html&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0&m=M4WyxD79MdKiV1ur-V2JqPcZ9LzaQGyxQCnCSYMbxaY&s=VyVBXkGMtDj1tDMlO-SCfjjE5xef4l5NCvUwC5lGtqc&e=
>
>    VSPERF
>
>
>
>    not created
>
>
>
>    sridhar....@spirent.com <mailto:sridhar....@spirent.com
> <sridhar....@spirent.com>>
>
>
>
>    2 graphs
>    - Frames(64,128,512,1024,1518) = f(time)
>    - Fps(64,128,512,1024,1518) = f(time)
>
>
>
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_vsperf_VSPERF-2BCI-2BResults&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0&m=M4WyxD79MdKiV1ur-V2JqPcZ9LzaQGyxQCnCSYMbxaY&s=a1LA6vJbVG9EDQ-ytRztlipw5qOohp90B8zLUzTGCP4&e=
>
>    bottlenecks
>
>
>
>    not created
>
>
>
>    gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com <mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com
> <gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>
>
>
>
>    Example done on local Kibana by Bottleneck team
>
>
>
>    problem as 1 graph = 1 result ( no time based) : which result shall
>    be represented / not matching usual filtering models
>
>    qtip
>
>
>
>    not created
>
>
>
>    zhangyujun+...@gmail.com <mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com
> <zhangyujun+...@gmail.com>>
>
>
>
>    ??
>
>
>
>    yardstick
>
>
>
>    not created
>
>
>
>    ross.b.bratt...@intel.com <mailto:ross.b.bratt...@intel.com
> <ross.b.bratt...@intel.com>>
>    jean.gaoli...@huawei.com <mailto:jean.gaoli...@huawei.com
> <jean.gaoli...@huawei.com>>
>
>
>
>    None ?
>
>
>
>    yardstick has already a complete dashboarding solution based on
>    grafana –no need for subpages in bitergia ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    Best,
>
>    Gabriel
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.opnfv.org_mailman_listinfo_opnfv-2Dtech-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0&m=M4WyxD79MdKiV1ur-V2JqPcZ9LzaQGyxQCnCSYMbxaY&s=Q_Aj1s4x0QGlUyklGcnLeZwl6UbHxeq10SYK65SUKtY&e=
>
>
> --
> Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
> Open Source and Standards, Red Hat -
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__community.redhat.com&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0&m=M4WyxD79MdKiV1ur-V2JqPcZ9LzaQGyxQCnCSYMbxaY&s=2afDDqVn0trDSSLpWj4Lw_0irCGvnCgFTVdrrFADRUQ&e=
> Ph: +1-978-399-2182 <+1%20978-399-2182> / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
> <+1%20978-799-3338>
> _______________________________________________
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.opnfv.org_mailman_listinfo_opnfv-2Dtech-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk-cgy0&m=M4WyxD79MdKiV1ur-V2JqPcZ9LzaQGyxQCnCSYMbxaY&s=Q_Aj1s4x0QGlUyklGcnLeZwl6UbHxeq10SYK65SUKtY&e=
> _______________________________________________
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to