> On Feb 12, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Eliot Lear <l...@cisco.com> wrote: > > Hi Stefan, > > Unless it is absolutely determined that the current work can't doesn't meet > criteria for an IETF standard, I would be opposed to such an exercise. For > one thing, we all have other things to do. For another, and as or more > important, we would be denying the reality of the situation.
The reality is that the TLS portion documented in the draft isn't implemented anywhere. I find it telling that the work is important enough to push through the WG, but not important enough that (as you say) the authors have other things to do... and don't have the time to document old work as different from new work. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
