Joel, As I stated in my earlier email, I think the in-band OAM is important area to work on. Just want to make sure that the proposed charter has room for other people to contribute alternative mechanisms that are not exactly same as the drafts currently being published.
Linda -----Original Message----- From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of joel jaeggli Sent: 2017年1月19日 9:28 To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutian...@huawei.com>; opsawg@ietf.org Cc: routing-...@ietf.org; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for In-Situ OAM drafts Hi, I thought I would try and wrap this up since we're a bit over a month since we put out the initial call after Seoul. By my observation there have been a number of favorable expressions of interest in pursuing this work both in OPS and elsewhere in the Routing area. That said I think one of the conclusions the IESG has taken from this is that In-band OAM is a cros- area activity and there is strong interest or perhaps need to have input and review in the Routing area. We have been exploring chartering this activity, which if it occurs renders the question of adoption here moot. The Ops and Routing chairs are trying to close the loop here, but I expect that a proposed charter will be forthcoming shortly and we should be able to progress this work. The statements of support and enthusiasm for pursuing it has been useful in gauging what to do with this proposal. Thanks joel On 12/6/16 10:36 PM, Zhoutianran wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > In Seoul, we got enough interest on the In Situ OAM work and positive > response on related drafts. > So this email starts a formal poll for adoption the following I-Ds. > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brockners-inband-oam-requirements-02 > .txt > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brockners-inband-oam-data-02.txt > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brockners-proof-of-transit-02.txt > > > > To be efficient, we have the poll for three I-Ds in one thread. But > you can give your opinion on each of them. And the result is per I-D. > > > > The question is: > Do you think that the WG should adopt all or some of these drafts? > > > > It would be helpful if you could indicate whether you have read the > drafts. If "yes", would you like to review the drafts and help to > improve the drafts? If "no", it is important that you provide reasons. > > > > This poll will last for two weeks, ending on Tuesday, December 20. > > > Thanks, > Tianran & Warren > > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
