Hi, Benoit, On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com> wrote:
> The way I see it, we're going to fix comments forever. > Right. But my concern was that the text that we're reading for an up/down vote can change after we read it, so I should be tracking the proposed text changes. That doesn't seem up/down. It seems like every other draft I've balloted on as an AD :-) Spencer > And we need to resolve this one before the current ADs step down. > > Regards, Benoit > > This may not be my week, when it comes to comprehension. At least, I'm 0 > for 2 so far today. > > Are we still tuning text in this draft? > > https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/iesg-ballots/ says that the > alternate balloting procedure is an up/down vote - we either agree to > publish, or agree to send a document off for rework. > > If we're still resolving comments, one can imagine that we'd get to a > one-Discuss situation, or even no Discusses, and wouldn't be doing an > Alternate Ballot on Thursday. > > I don't object to resolving comments (actually, I find that lovely), but I > don't know what we're doing. > > I've never seen the alternate balloting procedure executed (either as IESG > scribe or as an IESG member), so maybe I don't get it, and other people > have different expectations. > > Spencer > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing listOPSAWG@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > > >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
