On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:18 AM Douglas Gash (dcmgash) <dcmg...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi Warren, > > > > Yes, Thorsten, Andrej and I are actively engaged, and have been joined by > a new team member (John Heasley). > > > > There may be one or two minor other additions to enhance security that are > also coming along for submission to the views of the WG. > Just FYI, there are 459 people on the OpsAWG list; this means we have almost 500 witnesses to what I'm going to interpret as "We'll have this done in a few days/weeks" :-) Seriously though, thank you. The TACACS YANG document was discussed recently, and a bunch of ADs said "Oi! We largely approved the original document on the understanding that you'd fix this. Pay up now..." W > > > *From: *Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> > *Date: *Thursday, 22 April 2021 at 16:09 > *To: *opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>, Thorsten Dahm <thorstend...@google.com>, > Andrej Ota <and...@ota.si>, "Douglas Gash (dcmgash)" <dcmg...@cisco.com>, > "car...@ipsec.org" <car...@ipsec.org>, "lol.gr...@gmail.com" < > lol.gr...@gmail.com> > *Subject: *TACACS++, please... > > > > Hi there all, > > > > Last year we published "RFC8907 - The Terminal Access Controller > Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) Protocol" > > > > This was a huge amount of work, and we are hugely grateful to the authors > (and WG) for all of their hard work.... however, in the spirit of "no good > deed goes unpunished"... > > > > When we wrote this, it was with the understanding that we'd first puslish > how TACACS+ currently works, and then a second document which, AFAIR, would > basically say "... and now just run this over TLS, K, thanks, done". > > > > I'm hoping that someone, probably the original RFC8907 authors, would be > willing to take this on? > > I believe that this second document should be much much much easier.... > > > > So, RFC8907 authors, would you be willing to take this on? Please? > > > > W > > > > > > -- > > Perhaps they really do strive for incomprehensibility in their specs. > After all, when the liturgy was in Latin, the laity knew their place. > -- Michael Padlipsky > -- The computing scientist’s main challenge is not to get confused by the complexities of his own making. -- E. W. Dijkstra
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
