Hi, FWIW my preference would be for (3) and having a clean slate in IVY. Apart from the technical reasons of including software components from the start, already laid out by others, it also makes sense to take that as a practical approach. Authors of both drafts have done a good job and in the spirit of moving work forward in IVY and aiming to avoid unnecessary friction, (3) is best bet. The new draft should clearly mark that it "replaces" the other I-D clearly showing how the evolution happened and giving recognition to authors/WG where it is due.
Thanks! Dhruv On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:52 AM maqiufang (A) <maqiufang1= 40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Hi Working Group, > > > > It’s now time to start considering how to move forward with the inventory > base model. We have two different documents that could be used as a > starting point for our work or, in case the working group believes none of > them is “good enough”, we can start a brand new ID. > > In case the latter option is chosen, Daniele and I will write a -00 > version including just the table of content and what we’d like to be > covered in each section. The document will then be handed over to a pool of > authors which will bring it till the WG adoption. > > > > Hence, we will have a 3 weeks polling starting today. We decided to make > it a bit longer than usual because this time the working group is requested > to review two drafts instead of one. > > > > This mail starts a 3 weeks polling, terminating on September 15th, where > we would like the working group to express your preference among: > > > > 1. Adopt draft-ietf-ccamp-network-inventory-yang-02 in IVY and evolve > it to become the network inventory base model > 2. Adopt draft-wzwb-opsawg-network-inventory-management-03 in IVY and > evolve it to become the network inventory base model > 3. Start a brand new document from scratch as described above > > > > In the week after the closure of the polling (between September 18 and 25) > we will have an IVY interim meeting to discuss the issues/concerns raised > during the polling ( A separate mail will be sent). > > > > Thank you, > > > > Qiufang and Daniele > > > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > cc...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
