Hi All, I support this work.
The importance of this work is to eliminate the ambiguity how to express a connection between two network nodes in order to exchange the information between two parties, especially for the purpose of an orchestration. This impacts not only to the other IETF work, but also to the other SDOs'. 3GPP SA5 refers this work in their Technical Specification even though these are still individual drafts. All the best, Kenichi -- Kenichi Ogaki KDDI Corp. | NW Dev. Div. -----Original Message----- From: OPSAWG <opsawg-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Monday, October 2, 2023 10:22 PM To: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: Attachment circuits work At IETF 117, we asked the room if there was support to adopt the four attachment circuits drafts. The room had support (of the 75 present, 18 raised hands for adoption interest, 1 was opposed), but the list is where it counts. While the drafts aren’t too terribly long, there are four of them, so we will do a three week call for adoption. Please review and comment on-list on the following indicating whether you support their adoption or not: * draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac * draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit * draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit * draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue The authors and contributors have all signaled there is no known IPR covering this work. The CfA will end on October 23. Thanks. Joe _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
