I support the set of drafts – standardization of attachment circuits is very valuable
thanks Julian Juniper Business Use Only From: OPSAWG <opsawg-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Monday, 2 October 2023 at 14:22 To: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org> Subject: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: Attachment circuits work [External Email. Be cautious of content] At IETF 117, we asked the room if there was support to adopt the four attachment circuits drafts. The room had support (of the 75 present, 18 raised hands for adoption interest, 1 was opposed), but the list is where it counts. While the drafts aren’t too terribly long, there are four of them, so we will do a three week call for adoption. Please review and comment on-list on the following indicating whether you support their adoption or not: · draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac · draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit · draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit · draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue The authors and contributors have all signaled there is no known IPR covering this work. The CfA will end on October 23. Thanks. Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
