The call for adoption has concluded. Unfortunately, the hold down on draft submissions is now in effect. All part of my evil plan, I guess 😊.
Thanks to all that responded with comments. Despite the fact the work consists of four documents, there does appear to be considerable support for tackling this effort with upsides in both complementing IETF work (e.g., with LxNM) as well as O-RAN. Authors, when able, please resubmit the drafts as draft-ietf-opsawg-…-00 (replacing each of the original drafts respectively). The chairs would also appreciate (from authors as well as the broader WG) suggestions for a shepherd as this work progresses. A reminder to the WG that the authors and contributors replied that there is no known IPR covering this work. Thanks. Joe From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com> Date: Monday, October 2, 2023 at 09:21 To: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org> Subject: CALL FOR ADOPTION: Attachment circuits work At IETF 117, we asked the room if there was support to adopt the four attachment circuits drafts. The room had support (of the 75 present, 18 raised hands for adoption interest, 1 was opposed), but the list is where it counts. While the drafts aren’t too terribly long, there are four of them, so we will do a three week call for adoption. Please review and comment on-list on the following indicating whether you support their adoption or not: · draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac · draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit · draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit · draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue The authors and contributors have all signaled there is no known IPR covering this work. The CfA will end on October 23. Thanks. Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
