No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Cheers, Tal. On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 5:23 PM [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear all, > > authors and contributors draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization (and the WG > at large). > > Ahead of second WG last call, we want to get an updated lay of the land in > terms of IPR. > > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft” > > or > > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules” > > or > > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > > appropriate. > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the > > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > > aware of any relevant IPR. > > > > Please send the response to the list above and don’t unicast it. > > Joe and Benoît > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
