Hi, Benoit, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Thanks, — Carlos. > On Sep 12, 2025, at 7:10 AM, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Benoit, > > No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. > > Thanks, > Adrian > > From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Sent: 11 September 2025 15:23 > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: [OPSAWG]IPR POLL: draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization, Guidelines > for Characterizing "OAM" > > Dear all, > authors and contributors draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization (and the WG > at large). > Ahead of second WG last call, we want to get an updated lay of the land in > terms of IPR. > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? > Please state either: > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft” > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > If yes to the above, please state either: > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules” > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > aware of any relevant IPR. > > Please send the response to the list above and don’t unicast it. > Joe and Benoît
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
