Hi Benoit,
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Adrian From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: 11 September 2025 15:23 To: [email protected] Subject: [OPSAWG]IPR POLL: draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization, Guidelines for Characterizing "OAM" Dear all, authors and contributors draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization (and the WG at large). Ahead of second WG last call, we want to get an updated lay of the land in terms of IPR. Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft” or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules” or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. Please send the response to the list above and don’t unicast it. Joe and Benoît
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
