Hi WG, Charis,

I have reviewed this draft. The document is well written. Just see below
about some minor issues and comments:

--- COMMENTS ---

Section 5.1., paragraph 7:

>       "group-id" is defined as a string rather than unsigned integer

  I'm fine if the "group-id" is not limited to a give set of valid
  characters or patterns. But there is even no limit about the length of
  a "group-id"?


--- Typos and Nits ---

Appendix A., paragraph 36:

>                </byday>
>                <byday>
>                  <weekday>friday</weekday>
>                </byday>
>              <recurrence>

  typo? <recurrence> -> </recurrence>


Appendix A., paragraph 37:

>            </effective-schedule>
>          </ace>
>          <ace>
>            <name>rule2</name>
>            <matches>
>              <ipv6>
>                <destination-ipv6-network>2001:db8:1234::/64</\
>                                                destination-ipv6-network>
>                <source-ipv6-network>2001:db8::2:1/64</source-ipv6-\
>                                                                 network>
>              </ipv4>

  typo? </ipv4> -> </ipv6>


Appendix A., paragraph 38:

>            </matches>
>            <actions>
>              <forwarding>reject</forwarding>
>            </actions>
>            <effective-schedule xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-\
>                                                                ucl-acl">
>              <period>
>                <period-start>2026-01-20T08:30:00-08:00</period-start>
>                <period-end>2026-12-31T18:00:00-08:00</period-end>
>              </period>
>            </effective-schedule>
>          </ace>
>        </aces>
>        </aces>

  nits: should remove the repeated </aces>

Best regards,
Jensen


On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 10:25 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello, WG.  We’re extending the WG LC on this by a week until October 6 to
> hopefully get a couple of DIR reviews and some more comments from the WG
> itself.
>
>
>
> Please, take the time to read this and comment on its readiness.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Joe and Benoît
>
>
>
> *From: *Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Monday, September 15, 2025 at 09:14
> *To: *opsawg <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *WG LC: A YANG Data Model and RADIUS Extension for Policy-based
> Network Access Control (draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl)
>
> Hello, opsawg.  With the IPR disclosure done (no known IPR has been
> disclosed) and a new -08 revision, we are ready to begin a two week WG LC
> for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl/.  Please
> reply to the list with comments and support for this work being ready to
> move forward to the IESG for publication.
>
>
>
> The WG LC will run until September 29.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Joe and Benoît
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to