Hi Olaf, On 8/25/10 12:10 PM, Olaf Selke wrote: > blutmagie Tor network status site apparently displays incorrect > bandwidth values for all nodes running version 0.2.2.15. Unlike other > tns sites blutmagie calculated bw as an average from the extra-info data > instead of using the bw peak value. So far I don't have a clue what's > going wrong. The extra-info format might have changed or my Perl script > populating the mysql db might be buggy. > > Blutmagie4 which is is running v0.2.2.14 for testing purpose still shows > up with the correct bw > http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/index.php?SR=Bandwidth&SO=Desc. All > 0.2.2.15 nodes like trusted, teunTest, or the other three blutmagie > nodes are displayed with a bw being obviously much too low.
This might be related to: Changes in version 0.2.2.15-alpha - 2010-08-18 - Relays report the number of bytes spent on answering directory requests in extra-info descriptors similar to {read,write}-history. Implements enhancement 1790. There are now two new lines "dirreq-read-history ..." and "dirreq-write-history ..." containing the bytes spent on the dir protocol. Maybe TNS greps for "read-history" and not "^read-history" when parsing descriptors? I'll have more time to investigate this tomorrow. Please let me know if you find something interesting in the meantime. Thanks, --Karsten *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/