Am 25.08.2010 12:35, schrieb Karsten Loesing: > > On 8/25/10 12:10 PM, Olaf Selke wrote: >> blutmagie Tor network status site apparently displays incorrect >> bandwidth values for all nodes running version 0.2.2.15. Unlike other >> tns sites blutmagie calculated bw as an average from the extra-info data >> instead of using the bw peak value.
[...] > This might be related to: > > Changes in version 0.2.2.15-alpha - 2010-08-18 > - Relays report the number of bytes spent on answering directory > requests in extra-info descriptors similar to {read,write}-history. > Implements enhancement 1790. > > There are now two new lines "dirreq-read-history ..." and > "dirreq-write-history ..." containing the bytes spent on the dir > protocol. Maybe TNS greps for "read-history" and not "^read-history" > when parsing descriptors? yes exactly! And cause the dirreq-history data lines are displayed behind the ordinary read/write history data, the script summed up the dirreq bandwidth. Thus blutmagie tns mistakenly displayed the (correct) directory request bandwidth for all 0.2.2.15 nodes. This is fixed now. regards Olaf *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/