Well, Ernst did a fine job, but it'd be better if he'd done those things
in XML... *runs*
Anyway, IMHO adding a methodology on top of the purpose of the article -
showing the CMP stuff - would have been yet more to learn. I'm of the
opinion that something like that needs to show off one aspect of the
technology rather than all aspects, so MVC - while useful - would have
been yet another thing to track.
BTW, Ernst *is* in the process of writing a DTD for the primers. :)
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Fyffe Carl wrote:
> I went to jollem.com and read the CMP Primer. Good read. But it got me
> thinking about a topic that concerns most people that are in large
> development groups. Seperation of code and html. Proper MVC calls for the
> code to be in the controller while there is little code in the view portion
> of the application. This allows the designers to design and the coders to
> code.
>
> Were the rules broken for convience or has a new methodology taken over? It
> seems to me that the CMP Primer would have been easier to read and
> understand if MVC had been used.
>
> This one short coming can easily overlooked to find a gem of an article.
> Are there other primers of jollem.com's caliber? What are some useful URL's
> that you guys used to get started.
>
> --Carl
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://epesh.com/ IT Consultant
