Hypersonic sql has temporary become hsql, as it tries to find a home with a new 
development team.  There are other options also, mentioned in this list before, like 
mysql (www.mysql.com), postgresql (www.postgresql.org), and instantdb 
(www.enhydra.org).

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:         Russ White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 11:01 AM
> To:   Orion-Interest
> Subject:      RE: Orion on RedHat
> 
> Actually the Hypersonic DB that comes with Orion is quite suitable for small sites, 
>and it is fast, and works well with Orion because it already has the configuration 
>for the db in the distribution.
> 
> I would stick Hypersonic unless you really need something else.
> 
>        -----Original Message-----
>       From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>       Sent:   Thursday, March 22, 2001 10:10 AM
>       To:     Orion-Interest
>       Subject:        RE: Orion on RedHat
> 
>       Russ,
> 
>       Thanks for the news. I was hoping that this set up would work as it is easy to 
>get relatively cheap hosting based on RaQ and Linux.
> 
>       One more question, if that's OK: at the moment we are doing without a database 
>(information is stored in XML files). However, we may need to get one at some point. 
>Which database system (low cost) would work OK in this configuration?
> 
>       Many thanks again.
> 
>       Jarek 
> 
>       >  -----Original Message-----
>       > From:         [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>       > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>       > Sent: 22 March 2001 14:10
>       > To:   Orion-Interest
>       > Subject:      RE: Orion on RedHat
>       > 
>       > This actually sounds like a good setup for what you want to do.
>       > 
>       > I have setup many site for non-profits with a setup similar to 
>       > what you are doing.
>       > 
>       > Using Linux in such an environment is a great idea because you 
>       > can set it up like a hands off appliance, and it is very cost effective.
>       > 
>       > you could actually get by with less then a gig of HD space but 
>       > the more the better.
>       > 
>       > as far as RAM 64-128 meg has work fine for me even on busy sites. 
>       > 256 meg to 1+ gig is great but not generally necessary for small sites.
>       > 
>       > Get the new sun JDK and not IBM's as IBM's is prone to crash.
>       > 
>       > Use the newest version of Orion if you are going to be doing any 
>       > EJB 2.0 experimenting.
>       > 
>       > Have fun!!!
>       > 
>               >  -----Original Message-----
>               > From:         [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>               > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>               > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 7:06 AM
>               > To:   Orion-Interest
>               > Subject:      Orion on RedHat
>               > 
>               > Dear All,
>               > 
>               > We are planning for a budget (read 'cheap') deployment of a 
>               > website running on Orion for a charity. We're thinking about 
>               > RedHat Linux 6 on a Cobalt RaQ3 server. Does anybody has any 
>               > experience of running Orion on such kit? What resources (RAM, 
>               > etc.) should a single server have in order to run it comfortably 
>               > (it is just an informational web site with limited traffic)?
>               > 
>               > Many thanks for your
>               > 
>               > Jarek
>               > 
>               > Nesscomp Limited
>               > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>               > =========================================================== 
>               > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
>intended
>               > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
>addressed.
>               > Nesscomp Ltd do not accept legal responsibility for the contents of
>               > this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the
>               > author and do not necessarily represent those of Nesscomp Ltd.
>               > This message can not be classed as SPAM, the recipient has not
>               > been added to any mailing lists.
>               > 
>               > 
>               > 

Reply via email to