Because SOMEONE (I'm not going to mention BEA's name) couldn't see their way around actually optimizing that way. There is an actual performance benefit, I suppose, in that local interfaces and home objects don't throw RemoteException, but personally, I think this is a sign that Sun was serious when they put the black hole in ".com".
--------------------------------------------------------- Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Greg Matthews wrote: > > ....and can anyone shed some light on why this has even been put in the J2EE > spec. > > Visibroker for Java automatically detected if the client was local and then > handed out a client stub that did not do marshalling, i.e. performed an > in-process local java method call. > > I would have thought that the whole concept of Local references was just an > optimisation that a vendor provided based on common sense. > > Why is it in the spec? > > Greg. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eddie Post" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 4:54 AM > Subject: Local interfaces difference ??? > > > > Hellu, > > > > Can someone tell me what the performance boost is when you change your > > remote and home interfaces to local interfaces with Orion 1.5.4 ? > > > > I did this but I know that with Bea you could already indicate if your > beans > > and clients were located on the same machine such that it already had some > > kind of local workaround. I was wandering how Orion did and does this ?? > > > > Eddie > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > > > > > > >
