On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 17:34 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 16:31 +0100, Lukas Zeller wrote: > > I also attached a PDF (Synthesis_SyncML_SAN_implementation_notes.pdf) > > which documents the way we have implemented SAN in the Synthesis PDA > > clients (Winmobile and PalmOS). It might answer some of the questions > > already. > > Yes, it does, at least for the HTTP server case.
Some more questions... First, the SyncML server may choose a Session ID in one of the SAN fields. If it does, the client is expected to use that in its first SyncML message. Is this supported by the Synthesis engine when running as client? Second, when using the Synthesis server to synchronize against phones via Bluetooth we will have to emulate other servers ("PC Suite") and their URIs, otherwise the phones won't know how to sync with us. We don't want to name our server datastores according to what some other software has chosen. Even if we wanted, we can't do that if one phone expects to sync against "contacts" and the other against "addressbook". I suppose configuring "aliases" for datastores might work, where the alias is chosen based on the current peer. Has this been considered or even implemented already? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list os-libsynthesis@synthesis.ch http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis