On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 10:34 +0100, Lukas Zeller wrote: > Hello Patrick, > > On Oct 6, 2009, at 11:05 , Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > [sysync_malloc/realloc/free] > >>> I'm more than happy to get rid of them, but wasn't sure whether > >>> the code > >>> then still works as intended in all circumstances (for example, when > >>> combined with other code which uses the sysync_* memory profiling). > >> Maybe Lukas sees some restrictions here ? > > > > Lukas? > > Yes, as long as we want to retain profiling.h and the possibility to > use the very primitive profiling provided by that we'd have to retain > sysync_malloc/realloc/free. > > But no objection to get rid of that entirely - with the tools we have > today it became really obsolete.
Then I vote for removing it or at least declaring it obsolete. I'm not sure whether it matters, but there are already other "plain" malloc() calls in the SDK. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list os-libsynthesis@synthesis.ch http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
