On Fr, 2010-02-12 at 17:03 +0000, Lukas Zeller wrote: > I can just say, if you come to the point where a superdatastore seems > to need any admin data (profiles, maps, anchors, whatever) you're off > track :-)
That's what I expected ;-) I only asked for hints while looking into the source further. I later noticed the dependency between initializing the anchors in the sub-datastores and using them in the superdatastore. > So, regarding engPrepareClientSyncAlert(): The problem is that this, > as a client-only routine, has never been made superdatastore aware, > i.e. it's not a virtual (SUPERDS_VIRTUAL) and TSuperDataStore does not > have a derived implementation for it (yet). I got it working without such a change. Of course, "working" and "working nicely/as intended" are possibly different. Let me know if you'd like to see it implemented differently. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list os-libsynthesis@synthesis.ch http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
