Hi Sachin, if what you need is just a lot of pure SyncML clients to run against your server, you might consider using my former employer's free SyncML DEMO client (see http://www.synthesis.ch/dl_client.php?bp=CLI&pv=&vtag=13).
Apparently it hasn't been touched since I left there 2010, and it's not opensource, but is based on the same SyncML engine as used in SyncEvolution, with the same XML config. It only has a simplistic TAB separated text file backend. But it is small, simple and can be started from the command line, including injecting parameters into the XML config (such as different user names, device ids) via the -D command line option. Other people have used this client for creating test loads, so that might work for you as well. However, that was long time ago, don't ask me about more details :-) Best Regards, Lukas On 29.04.2014, at 19:52, Sachin Gupta <ching...@gmail.com> wrote: > one more thing. everytime i invoke syncevolution, it has to load all > the xmls, build up its data structures, and all the other stuff. > Can i implement threads in it and run it as a daemon. This will i can > save time from doing all this. > > From within, can i then implement threads and launch multiple sync operations? > > Can this be done in Syncevo or you foresee issues in this ? > > Kindly suggest > > Regards > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Sachin Gupta <ching...@gmail.com> wrote: >> yes :) doing some profiling. Will update with the results. >> >> How do i maintain the load on the server; 2400 users for an hour? >> Can JMeter or locust help me in this or i will need custom built >> scripts for this? >> >> Any suggestions? >> >> Regards >> >> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> >> wrote: >>> On Sat, 2014-04-26 at 23:42 +0530, Sachin Gupta wrote: >>>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 15:03 +0530, Sachin Gupta wrote: >>>>>> Can you suggest how i can test SyncML Server performance and have 2500 >>>>>> users/syncevolutions connecting simultaneously? >>>>> >>>>> There's no ready-made solution. You'll have to write your own scripts >>>>> for configuring SyncEvolution and running the desired benchmark. >>>>> >>>>> Note that each context in SyncEvolution gets its own device ID. So if >>>>> you want to simulate n different devices, use: >>>>> >>>>> syncevolution --configure ... client-1@client-1 >>>>> ... >>>>> syncevolution --configure ... client-n@client-n >>>>> >>>> I figured so. So wrote scripts which will launch syncevo each with >>>> unique device ids and seperate user accounts. >>>> But the concern is managing these number of syncs through a time >>>> period. Exploring if JMETER can help me out in this.\ >>>> Also being a process, it would not be possible to launch so many >>>> processes in parallel. >>>> Memory and CPU would be issues, right? Would need very high end >>>> systems for this? >>> >>> I have not measured this. Try it and you'll see. My expection is that >>> you will need multiple client machines, though. >>> >>>> Would it be possible doing this launching processes or shall i look >>>> into creating threads within the Syncevolution launching and >>>> controlling sessions from there? >>> >>> I would just use multiple client machines. Much simpler and scales >>> perfectly. >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, Patrick Ohly >>> >>> The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although >>> I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way >>> represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak >>> on behalf of Intel on this matter. >>> >>> >>>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list os-libsynthesis@synthesis.ch http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
